The board of directors of Marvel Anime is full of gunpowder.

After all, after attracting EA Games to join the company, the valuation influence brought by it will directly affect the returns of many shareholders.

As investors, they are not the company they control, they only care about their own interests.

Who is managing this company? It has no direct relationship with them.

If someone you don’t like acquires this company, at most it is to sell the stocks you have and choose to exit.

But if the new owner of this company is able to make a big profit in his stock, investors will naturally be happy. Anyway, they are just investing and not wanting to manage this company.

However, in the current situation, EA Games only wants to purchase 20% of the part, and does not directly affect the status of the major shareholder. For these investors, they naturally agree with both hands and feet.

"Your concern is not a problem at all. If EA Games wants to buy our superhero copyright, we can list a series of relatively harsh conditions in the purchase contract.

For example, if it is released simultaneously with DC's superheroes during the same period, the production costs of these two games must be kept the same.

Although we are not professionals in the game, we should receive detailed evaluations from us before releasing the game. As long as we strictly check the quality of the game, just like the animation magazines we publish, there will be no problems.

Since we are not worried about the problem with the game itself, what else can we worry about?

Now that DC has introduced EA Games to become a strategic partner, everyone should also see how popular the relevant news is.

If nothing unexpected happens, a rating company will give DC's latest rating before tonight. If DC's stock is listed in the circulation market now, then this rating must be a buy level." Some investors scoffed at the conditions raised by someone before. Such an idea is simply too weak, and elementary school students will not consider such issues.

If both parties clearly stipulate what should be done and what should not be done in the contract, then there will be no mistakes in game quality control.

At that time, if you keep the same level as DC's games, then the next thing you are facing is market testing.

We have been with our colleagues for decades, and the animation we discovered is also in the same market, and even many superheroes have quite a lot of similar elements.

Since the market can test success or failure in animation distribution, why are you so timid when you are not good at the game industry?

"I agree with this view. If we give up our EA Games and turn to Atari Games, it will be a very dangerous option for us.

Atari Games has indeed pioneered the era of home consoles. It transplanted bulky arcade games into the living room, allowing thousands of households to experience the fun of new era video games without leaving home.

But we have to admit that Atari Games has begun to decline. The Neon Country market has completely lost all its market share. Even North America is facing difficult sales difficulties in its base camp.

Whether it is the performance of the game console, the possibility of game content and the entertainment, it is far away from being wide open by its opponents. Consumers will not spend money to buy backward products, nor will they spend money to buy unfunny games.

The same price is $25, so why choose a game with poor graphics and low playability?

If Atari Games cannot change this situation in a short period of time, cannot produce a game that can match its opponents, or even surpass it a little bit. Then Atari Games will be extremely dim in the future.

Just like our anime magazines, if the magazine content of the rival company is funny, passionate, and has a good plot, the image of the anime characters is even more attractive.

At this time, the anime magazines we launched were still those old-fashioned and dogmatic anime characters. Obviously, the market will definitely leave me behind, and all consumers will not pay attention to our subsequent works. I believe that the company's management knows better than us.

So my suggestion is to introduce EA Games to become our strategic partner." Some of the new shareholders opposed it, but some tried their best to promote it.

Watching these investors all hope to introduce EA Games and become strategic partners.

The major shareholder wanted to jump up at this time and slapped them in the face.

35% of the company's stocks have been traded.

Who can guarantee that these 35% stock transactions will not be in it?

If EA Games is doing something behind the scenes and now sells 20% of its stocks, wouldn’t this mean that it’s just giving up the company?

However, after checking from multiple sources, the real mastermind behind the scenes was not found.

The more I can't find the real boss behind the scenes, the more I make these people frightened.

After all, these 35% of stock transactions are too sensitive in terms of time.

Anyone was worried that the status of his major shareholder would not be guaranteed.

"Since everyone agrees most, is anyone willing to sell their shares to EA Games? If so, I believe EA Games must give a very good valuation for acquisitions." The major shareholder looked at everyone present and asked a question that everyone despised.

The entry of EA Games Company means that the company will undergo a huge change.

Judging from the current limelight of EA Games in the gaming market, once it enters the market, Marvel's stock will rise.

At this time, who would be willing to sell stocks that will appreciate immediately to others easily? Everyone is not a child. Don’t you understand such a simple truth?

Who would be unable to get along with the money?

Unless EA Games Company gives a price that will never be rejected.

But at such a price, I believe EA Games will not be so unlucky in a short period of time.

Could it be that an animation magazine company with a valuation of 1 billion yuan be worth 2 billion yuan to trade with EA Games?

The other party is not stupid, so he will definitely not agree.

Since that's the case, why bother selling? Just wait for appreciation.

"In order to show our support, we are willing to sell 1%, and we hope that the remaining 19% can be shared. After all, we have just joined your company, and the shares we hold are only 5%. We buy with a valuation of US$1 billion. As long as EA Games Company gives a valuation of more than 1.2 billion, we agree to sell 1%. "The new shareholder who just entered the market is willing to take out 1% of the shares held by only 5% of the shares. This makes other old shareholders feel quite pressured.

"Our consortium is willing to sell 2%, as long as EA Games Company purchases with a valuation of 1.5 billion." Seeing the old shareholders not speaking out, someone said directly.

Everyone agrees with this kind of scene, but there is no actual action.

Instead of expecting others, it is better to take the lead and set a good example for everyone.

Sure enough, as soon as the old shareholder who held the shares opened his mouth, others began to calculate how many shares they had to sell to EA Game Company so that they could not only meet the needs of introducing them to become strategic partners, not suffer losses in transactions, or even not affecting their own interests in the future.

"I hold 10% of the company's shares, and I am willing to take out 2%. The remaining 15%, let's get together!" After the person who delivered the speech finished speaking, he had already expressed his attitude on behalf of 50% of the shares.

The first person to sell 1% was Lin Ping's confusing stake.

This 1% is equivalent to 35% of people expressing their opinions.

The second person who sold 2% held 7% of the company's stock. At this time, it was equivalent to the attitude expressed by 42% of people.

The last person who sold 2% owned 8% of the company's stock. At this time, it was equivalent to 50% of people who expressed their attitude.

50% of stock holdings sold only 5%, which means the remaining 50% will be sold for 15%.

This is simply cutting the meat of the major shareholder and drinking the blood of the major shareholder.

Even if it is not the major shareholder selling, but the small shareholder who has unlimited support for the major shareholder, this is unbearable.

Selling this 15% means losing 15% of the voice in the company.

Who knows what the situation is like for this 15%?

If the previous 35% was acquired by EA, plus the existing 15%, and the 4% of the two shareholders just stated, this is already completed, with an absolute controlling 51% of the company.

"For the sake of controlling the company, as the largest shareholder, I can only sell 2%. "The major shareholder looked at everyone helplessly and said.

After the major shareholder said this, several other people who supported the major shareholder's decisions said that they had no stocks to sell.

At this time, everyone expressed their attitude. In the end, only 7% of Lin Ping could buy it, and only 6% of his own people were deducted.

35% plus 6%, and now the holding of the company has reached 41%.

However, this is a huge gap from the 20% I wanted before.

"DC sold 20% of the shares of EA Games, and we have sold it to him so far only 7%. Do you think this is appropriate?

EA Games has different holdings in the two companies. How could he achieve equality?

All of us small shareholders are willing to sell our shares to complete this 20%. Why can't you, as major shareholders, make a little sacrifice for the future of the company?

If this transaction is less than 20%, we don’t need to waste time here.” The new shareholder looked at the major shareholder and said sarcastically.

Anyway, he is just an investor in the company and is not afraid of offending others. After all, he does not involve the management of the company.

As long as the company distributes dividends according to time, as an investor, there is no objection.

But the current situation is that this obviously affects investors' profits.

"This matter is not to be discussed. The stocks of several of us combined can completely control the company. We have every reason not to hold this board of directors and directly choose to reject EA Games. In addition to the newly entered shareholders, some people also clearly objected.

If everyone fails to reach an agreement, we will give up our cooperation with EA Games Company." The major shareholder's tycoon stood up and bite people at this moment.

Obviously, it will reach this point, and it is almost impossible to achieve any substantial progress.

At this moment, the Consumer Electronics Exhibition is full of media gathering.

Tomorrow is an open day for the public.

Today is an open day for media and professional fields.

All media and relevant people in professional fields around the world are allowed to visit.

The purpose is to create a quiet and convenient communication environment for major manufacturers.

But in this environment of visiting each other, there was still a booth that had not been completed.

All the workers are setting up their own booths, and the company's head is not in the mood to receive visitors from other manufacturers.

However, because the booth has not been arranged yet, the person in charge of other manufacturers also politely chose not to disturb him.

After all, tomorrow is a public open day. If the time to decorate the booth is delayed, it is obvious that this company will leave a very bad impression on the public.

The heads of other manufacturers looked at the workers who were working with sympathy and walked around helplessly.

Everyone doesn’t understand why the person in charge of this company has delayed the time until now?

The world's largest consumer electronics exhibition does not pay attention to it, and it has wasted time until now, which shows that the company's management must be very chaotic.
To be continued...