The barrage in the live broadcast room has been flooded with 666, and the audience at the scene are all confused.

It can be said that most of the people present did not expect Chen Mo to come up with this set of rhetoric.

Professor Xu's expression was very excited. Obviously he wanted to slap the table and say that it was "nonsense", but his hands were raised but he couldn't continue to slap.

The other two guests also looked at each other. It was obvious that their brains were running rapidly to refute this set of rhetoric, but they were exhausted for a moment.

Is there anything wrong with Chen Mo's statement?

Got a big problem!

At least the first reaction of the guest opposite when he heard Chen Mo's words was, isn't this nonsense?

But after sorting out the logic from beginning to end, it seems quite complete...

The examples listed by Chen Mo, including Mike's satirical capitalism, words on police cars, plots related to fib, etc., are indeed found in GTA. It is impossible for Chen Mo to publicly spread rumors in full view of the public. Since there are these elements, Chen Mo said that GTA is exposing the ugliness of capitalism, which seems to be logically very smooth.

Moreover, simply grasping the violent elements of gta is actually not very tenable.

When a carrier shows the plot with the main goal of "revealing" and "criticism", excessive beautification of the scene will greatly reduce this criticism. Simply put, for example, some essays about the beheading of the old society, and the ignorant people dipped the blood of revolutionaries in human blood and tried to cure diseases. This plot is actually quite bloody, even more bloody than shooting people with guns in most movies and TV series.

However, if you want to eliminate the influence of bloody and violence and over-beautify this plot, the "critical" effect it wants to achieve will no longer exist.

If all similar subjects are forcibly required to be done like fairy tales, it will only make people feel extremely false and eventually become complete cultural garbage.

These people's doubts about gta are mainly focused on its appearance of "violence", while Chen Mo raised the issue to a higher level of "spiritual connotation", so he directly raised the topic, forming a "dimensionality reduction strike".

The key to this is that gta must have sufficiently rich connotations.

There is really gta.

Is it a game that encourages crime? Not.

Most people just touch a little bit of fur and think that gta encourages everyone to commit crimes, but it is not.

GTA does not encourage crime, nor will it induce players to kill indiscriminately or abuse. It is not the joyful and exciting blood in the world that most people think, nor is it the unrestrained and revenge that young people yearn for, but the increasingly tight shackles. It tells the sadness of being played by the invisible enemy after defeating the visible enemy again and again.

In the world of GTA, there is never a false scene of marrying a rich and beautiful woman through crime and reaching the peak of life. Instead, they are constantly betrayed by their friends or betray their friends. They have to temporarily bow to the more powerful evil forces and act as dogs for fib's beasts.

Those stories that seem to stimulate players' hormones are actually just constantly wiping others' butts and completing tasks one after another, but they can never redeem their freedom from fib.

The protagonist who calls the wind and rain in the previous work may die like a wild dog in the next work, and no one cares about his life or death.

When you first enter the world of gta, many people may be addicted to the pleasure of killing and looting, but as the plot deepens, players feel the joys and sorrows of the protagonist and will find that everyone in the story, even those small supporting characters, also have their own sorrows. The deeper disclosure of the entire society's current situation derived from this is the key to differentiating gta from a cool game and becoming a perfect masterpiece.

...

The debate on "Today's Current Affairs Debate" is still ongoing, but the wind on the Internet has completely turned to Chen Mo.

Of course, Chen Mo's remarks cannot conquer everyone. For people like Professor Xu and Chen Baiyou, the position of "violent games will inevitably lead to crime" has been preset in their brains, and no matter how much explanation they have, it is impossible to convince them.

But of course Chen Mo's words were not said to the three opposing guests, but to all the viewers who were paying attention to this hot topic in front of the TV and computer.

What Chen Mo wants is the public's support, or at least not objection to GTA, but the entire social environment's tolerance and understanding of the development of games, especially virtual games.

In the second half of the show, several opposition guests and audience members were still trying to refute Chen Mo's statement, but Chen Mo responded one by one, completely taking the initiative in the scene.

At the end of the show, Hu Yue asked Chen Mo: "Thank you very much for Mr. Chen to attend the "Today's Current Affairs Debate" today to give an official explanation of the game GTA, which also allows us to better understand the true connotation of this game. Finally, I have another question, which is, a live audience just mentioned that traditional violent games may not have much impact, but as a next-generation VR, the immersion and realism of the matrix game cabin is far beyond that of traditional PC and mobile games. Will it have a more serious impact?"

Chen Mo did not answer directly, but asked back: "Please ask everyone, what do you think is the future of virtual reality technology?"

Hu Yue was stunned: "The future? I think the future should be getting closer and closer to the real world."

Chen Mo nodded: "Yes, the so-called virtual reality focuses on 'reality'. Whether some people are willing to admit it or not, the ultimate form of virtual reality will be to perfectly reproduce reality or even transcend reality. What kind of virtual reality world will we create in the future? Is it a 'paria' where everyone lives and works in peace and contentment without any crime?"

"I'm sorry, although this is a beautiful wish, it may only exist in the unrealistic ideas of a very small number of people. Judging from the current literary works, whether it is movies, TV series, comics or games, similar false pictures almost do not exist. If you don't believe it, you might as well think about whether there are any popular movies or best-selling books that "everyone lives and lives happily." I think similar scenes are only available in heaven."

"Why? Because most people don't like this kind of falsehood."

"Virtual reality will inevitably be diverse in the future, including truth, goodness, beauty, falsehood, evil and ugliness. Positive and negative are both sides of the coin. If you remove all negative things, the positive things will appear false and the whole world will become pale and powerless. Negative things are intended to inspire people's yearning for beautiful things and allow them to better understand what beauty is."
Chapter completed!