"Lu Ramnik" is Ye Wei's prank?!

The media and public were in chaos about this, and Ye Wei and "Ramnik" both yelled out laughter, shocked and scolded people.

Weimi was naturally relieved because it was just a false alarm. Some people enjoyed the fun. Look at Weihei, who was scolding, seemed to have his front teeth broken by a punch! They were really tricked by Viy. Some people were also dissatisfied. Brother Wei, what are you doing? Everyone was being fooled, and is this really good?

Compared to embarrassment, Weihei continued to attack when he was dazed, ridiculing this behavior was boring and naive. Ye Wei was indeed an idiot!

Some online media people also denounced Ye Wei for making such a thing as spreading rumors. Today is not April Fool's Day. He did this to ruin his justice and push himself to the opposite side. So some black media made ugly, but it also made the media that helped him feel anxious, so don't mess with others that can't help them.

All parties knew that Ye Wei would definitely come up with an explanation. Without waiting for a long time, the prank Dabai was almost in the early morning after almost the early morning of Ye Wei's social networking website:

[Wow! What happened to the "Lu Ramnik Incident" today? It's very simple, as you've seen it.

Lu is really a film critic. In fact, he often goes to Rotten Tomatoes to comment on movies. He just doesn't work for a gossip newspaper. I really gave him a gift and asked him to write a good film review for me. If I find him from the yellow pages in the middle of the night, then rush to Lu's house from the hotel to watch the movie before commenting. Lu likes my new movie very much. He will get full marks without a gift, but I ruined someone's good dream, how can I not make some compensation?

In any case, this is not a lie. Every sentence we say from beginning to end is composed of sincerity. Lu also introduced himself in his personal information. However, this sincerity seems too obvious, which makes some people think about lies, and the bribery that has not been told anywhere has become the "truth".

This matter is about the attitude towards things, and I agree with Bethany Hamilton's words: "When you get very close to something, it's hard to see what they used to be or are now." You know, don't just look at the appearance you see from the first glance, look at it from multiple angles and with your heart, otherwise you will easily be deceived by yourself, and liars are called clichés.

Perhaps some people call me "You are not misleading!" People are influenced by various misleadings and their ideas and cognitions, so easy to deceive! This is the most terrifying thing.

Well… it seems that someone asked me if I was referring to the controversy of Soul Surfer’s evaluation. Yes! That’s right! The general negative reviews of it in the film critics are misleading some viewers, not the majority of viewers who are generally highly praised. Some critics complain that the movie is a lie, Bethany is false, and everyone’s words and deeds are false.

I can't agree at all. First of all, why? Why is Bethany's mentality and behavior fake? None of the bad reviews gave convincing reasons, and they only said that because of "simple", "the characters are too smart", "the lack of true feelings", and "the religious emotions are too heavy"...

Sorry? Please allow me to interrupt. Bethany is a very devout Christian. Religious emotions play a pillar in her inner world. This movie tells her story. I cannot discuss cause and effect. I can only think of truthfully reflecting her inner face.

I'm an agnostic, but you and I know that religious beliefs are everything to some people, and Bethany never denies that.

"Too much religious emotion" cannot be the reason for commenting on its bad movies, because it is the same as Bethany's story, which is true. But it's not that I boast that religious background will not affect an audience's ability to gain power from "Soul Surfers", it is definitely not a simple story.

Another part of the film critics criticized it as a spiritual chicken soup that ignores the pain of reality. Perhaps it was because the peak of pain in the film did not meet their needs. Bethany cried and rolled from one end of the beach to the other end of the beach. After being bruised all over the body, he stood up again. It was not that story, and Bethany was not that person.

For a young girl aged 13-14, it doesn’t take much complicated process to cheer up strongly. When it reaches the depths of Bethany’s soul, her darkness is only there. There is no more, more so-called “real” darkness and difficulties that are yours, not hers, she is already the real her.

Speaking of this, we have a question, which is the problem we considered in the adaptation stage of the script, whether we want a real Bethany, or a real Bethany in the eyes of the critics? If we choose the latter, we have to put a lot of darkness that does not belong to her on her. What she thinks and says will be a fake girl in the heart of an adult.

Although I had no intention of making a youth movie, I didn't want to shoot a fake Bethany story. So I chose the former, a shark attacked and lost her left arm and said the first sentence was "When can I surf again?", and retrained a month later and returned to the ocean field two months later. There was pain, but more strong real Bethany.

Ageing age does not mean that people have greater courage, but it is usually the opposite that people lose courage.

Proverbs such as "the more wisdom in life, the less courage" and "the newborn bear is not afraid of wolves" also tell us this. This is exactly what happened in Bethenina. Her courage has multiple sources, and I dare say that one of them is her youth.

You who are old should feel more painful, more struggle, and more complicated when your mentality changes. That will happen to an old person, not her! Why don’t you want to let go of your prejudice and look at this 13-year-old girl? Haven’t you seen her eyes full of innocent hope?

The so-called courage of youth is not thinking so much, believing that all dreams can come true, Bethany believes that adults do not easily or even never believe, so she creates miracles, rather than still struggling with whether to continue surfing. But she also has the fickleness of a girl (young boys can do it). She has the heart to be frustrated, has cried, and has thought of giving up. What she does not have is the iron determination or the movie-style awakening that will no longer be troubled from now on. Even if she becomes the surfing champion, she will still have the next setback and frustration.

"Soul Surfer" has presented the most real Bethany, I don't understand how this can be false?

I don’t understand even more what the reason for the bad reviews of “why is a drama rather than a documentary” is, why does biographical movies exist? Why are you a film critic? Why do I write this diary? I want to know the reason.

Having said that, I still know something about what you want, a black coach, or an old man, and best of all, a black coach with a white wool-like hair and beard who has been in jail in Shawshank Prison. Then my movie has a shield of political correctness, which is much scary than God.

But how many such "coach-player" movies do we have? Good and bad, praise and scolded, adapted to real and fiction?

"The Red Pink League" (1992), "The Ice Light" (1993), "The Tea Boy" (1998), "The Glorious Years" (2000), "The Pitcher of the Heart" (2002), "Coach Carter" (2005), "Reviving the Playing Style" (2006, Still Released), "We Are Marshall" (Scheduled 12-22 this year)..

Oh my God! There are too many, and I can’t count them at all. I can only say some representative ones. It seems that the world will not work without the coach (sorry, my football coaches, I love you!). No, we still have Gucci. If you don’t like it, just prada. Who doesn’t like pandas?

This is the biggest cliché in Hollywood sports movies, as if the only legal person to educate the protagonist in this type of film is the coach, and others are too smart once they do that, even the protagonist's parents. Please, who wouldn't say a few words "Everything will be OK"?

Everyone, everything will be fine!

Fake, this matter is not good. First of all, I have to say that I am also a film critic. Some friends who are familiar with me probably know that I have no intention of offending me. I am going to start being rude. There are some fools in the film critic! There is no other meaning, it means fools. But I believe that they will praise me for being talented twice this year.

In addition, today this incident was not my first idea, it was just an imitation of David Merrick. Maybe someone doesn’t know what happened, I’ll tell you briefly.

Legendary drama producer David Mer (1911-2000, "Hello, Dolly!" and other works have won 9 Tony Awards, 28 nominations, and 2 personal honorary awards). Before the performance of his new drama "Subways-are-for-sleeping" in 1961, he expected that the seven major drama critics of New York, Howard Taubman, Wat Cole, John Chapman, John McLean, Richard Watts Jr., Norman Nadal and Robert Coleman will criticize the musical, and then...

Merrick found seven ordinary citizens with the same name and surname as them from the yellow pages of New York, invited them to watch the internal performance of the new drama and gain the right to use their names, and then coaxed them to say clichés such as "the greatest musical comedy in nearly thirty years", "the best musical ever", "a fabulous musical, I love it", and then published a full-page advertisement in the New York Herald, which listed the praise and names of these seven drama critics (in bold).

This "relatively reviewed" musical lasted for 205 shows, which lasted almost six months. The audience was very happy to watch it, and no one cared about what the other group of drama critics said.

Do you want to say that the audience is misled? This may be fame. How can the comments affect the nature of the audience? When you look at a work with a pilgrimage and tolerance, everything is good, and even bad can be tolerated or you find reasons to become good, and you always see its good; when you look at it with a skeptical and picky mind, everything is bad, and if you can't tolerate it a little bad, and even good can become bad, you always see its bad.

This is the case in 1961, and it is still the case now. It is not only happening in how to view a work, but in looking at anything. It rarely shows its objective and opinion.

However, it turns out that in this era, you can't use this trick to deceive the world for six months, and paparazzi are really everywhere.

When talking about David Merrick, people praised him for his wit and false propaganda, but now they mostly talk about good things. Many things take time to judge, and I put them here. 45 years later, when people talk about the "Lu Lamnik incident", they will only laugh and praise me as an interesting person. They may also say, "Look, look, Ye Wei was willing to sacrifice his reputation in order to alert the world back then. What a great person! I love him."

Thank you! To be honest, this is so fun, hahaha.
Chapter completed!