As soon as these three policy topics came out, Bai Gui glanced at the corner of his eyes and found that many candidates were complaining secretly, but some candidates still showed confidence and answered as soon as they picked up their pens.

Looking at him, five or six of these candidates in good condition were all classmates he had met in the Normal School. I think they were like themselves, and they had a way to study in the Normal School.

Others are studying in other higher education institutions.

As for those who complain, there is naturally no way, and they can only study hard in the countryside.

It seems to be the same test paper, but as soon as I enter the venue, I divided the people into different levels.

These test questions are somewhat related to the questions in the normal school’s test a few days ago. They are not deeply involved, but they are similar to each other. If you read a few more articles, you can probably figure out how to answer them.

This test question is reasonable. I heard that there are also questions about the Suez Canal opening and other questions...

"The first two are not very difficult to solve these three strategies. The first one can answer them by reading more foreign historical materials. The second one has been discussed in the agriculture of Shiwuzhai, and I have also carefully studied them. As for the third one..."

"There is no difficulty for the exam for those who have remembered the exam, but the person who has not remembered the exam will be allowed to perform and will inevitably fall under the premature..."

Bai Gui briefly analyzed the three problems. After all, it was the second difficulty in taking the scholars. It was not the provincial examination, the imperial examination, the palace examination, and the major examination, which was not the level of solving the problems of the country. They are not yet a child of children. Only after the examination of the provincial examination can they be considered a child of children. They are not qualified to provide advice for the country. These three problems are actually the erudition and memorization ability.

Of course, if you do not have the practice of eight-legged essays and are not familiar with some grammatical rhyme methods, even if you can answer three strategies, the article will be dry and read, the examiner will not be admitted to such candidates.

He pondered for a while and then felt a draft in his heart, and he picked up his pen to write to the page, "The Western Confucian scholar said: 'When two equal encounters, public law is power, and when two unequal encounters, power is public law.' I always recite his words and feel sad. The sincerity of public law cannot be relied on. Relying on public law is an excuse for powerful people."

He first asked about a strategy, that is, the arguments of such arguments.

The best paper is to explain the arguments from the sages. In the college entrance examination education in previous lives, Chinese teachers had long taught it.

In fact, the Western Confucian view of this sentence is derived from Rousseau's theory of equality and Spencer's theory of evolution. At this time, there were two theories in the academic community, namely, one is the equalist school, which respects Rousseau's "Theory of the People's Dealing", and the other is the powerful school, which is Spencer's "Theory of Evolution".

And who is the person who refines this point of view?

It was Liang Rengong who wrote in "The Discussion on the Changes of National Thoughts" seven years ago in 1901: "When two equal encounters, there is no so-called power, truth is power; when two unequal encounters, there is no so-called reason, power is truth."

Reform and reform is a reform movement, and it is not as if it is scared to talk about it. Now Emperor Guangxu and Empress Dowager Cixi have both died, so this sentence has nothing to do with the current situation.

Besides, he changed his original words.

Can plagiarism by scholars be called plagiarism? This is called learning from Liang Rengong’s views!

There are countless references like this, and the theoretical explanations of Rousseau and Spencer are everywhere on the streets.

The meaning of this sentence is also very simple. When two equal countries meet, international law is the greatest power, but when two unequal countries meet, strength is power!

Next, the explanation of this argument is: "In the past century, the countries in Taixi have been evenly matched, and there is no one who can bare people to make themselves rich, but they have started to preserve the land. After hearing this suddenly, there may be some necessity, and even labor hard to pay for the troops... In fact, it is not only true that they end up with profit, but they are the ones who do their own things. How is the skill of foreign policy such as this?"

Taixi, Tai means big and extreme, so Taixi generally means generally refers to Western countries.

This sentence means that in Europa, all countries are evenly matched and they cannot kill a country, but they consume too much money and food, so they can only allow other countries to pay compensation. Over time, such a foreign policy practice will be formed...

After writing this passage, we will give a list of historical materials.

The most important thing to ask is to quote a verbal evidence, so that it is correct to explain your own point of view.

"In the past, when Napoleon wanted to attack Britain, the British seized the Danish navy for self-defense, and also protected the Western Portuguese and interfered in their internal affairs. At that time, it was nothing more than that, in line with public law. In the end, the British held the full power of the sea without resisting it. This is a matter."

"The Vienna Conference was to preserve the European situation. They took Napoleon's destruction and built them one by one. The name was not unjust, but since it was, Russia and Opp divided Poland, Soson ceded land at Prat, the Netherlands had flown above the Rhine River, and the British had the general trend of the Mediterranean Sea. This is another matter."

"And the Battle of Crimea..."

Soon, historical materials were listed and the argument was rigorously demonstrated.

Bai Gui concluded with his last sentence: "Ah, the preservation of the land is the essence of public law, but it is only the resource for people to save money, which is unexpected by the public law."

As for the Qing court's case of cedeing land and paying compensation, he would not make any taboos.

Adults are also shameless.

The second policy theory is about the system of the Zhou Dynasty. It is the most detailed in agricultural management. In recent years, most people believe that artificial management is more important than climate. The key points are land, capital, and labor. Being able to use these three resources correctly requires knowledge of the Knowledge Network. Now a new academic system has been set up, and agriculture is listed as an independent discipline. I hope to retain the academic achievements of agricultural research. Please state the methods of agricultural education.

What effective methods can ordinary scholars propose for this kind of strategy?

Just like answering questions in later generations, you only need to list the recent policies on agriculture. It is best to use other countries' methods to make suggestions, but don't give too much. It's best to mention one or two points, and don't mention too much.

If you write too much, do you think the adults in the court are stupid pigs?

Although the imperial examination was changed to the eight-legged essay and the question was the same as before. The important thing was the first one. As long as the first one was passed and the team was recorded, they would pass the next few exams.

The first game also focuses on the first question, as the name suggests, is the first question.

If the dismissal is not dismissed, it depends on how the first question is written. There are nearly 1,500 people in the palace examination. The examiners have no time and mood to read it carefully one by one. They all look at one question, and if they have a rough impression, they can leave it. If the first question is written poorly, they will just stop the paper.

Bai Gui had already had a draft of the last two questions. He had carefully revised them one by one and would never make any taboos. He was the head of the case and would basically decide to accept them, so don’t make some minor mistakes.

The most important thing is to seek stability.
Chapter completed!