On the way back to China, Li Shaojie kept thinking about a lot of things.

I gained a lot from this trip abroad.

Moreover, it also allowed Li Shaojie to see some more things.

Although I have been abroad many times in the past, this time I am obviously closer to different cultures and cultural ideas.

The impact is naturally greater.

As a person, where should I go in the future?

Is there anything else that can be done or should be done? These are all things that need to be thought about.

This is necessary self-realization, and it is also a social responsibility that needs to be assumed.

I have to say that whether it is a lighthouse or a neon light, some cultural ideas are indeed valuable for reference and thinking.

But in many ways, it can also change people's thinking invisibly.

Cultural confrontations are often more terrifying.

If it is a military confrontation, then you come and I go, at least the weapons hit the real target.

Moreover, death is death.

In cultural conflicts, you often don’t even know how you “died”.

What's even more frightening is that these "dead" people often help each other deal with people who are not dead without even realizing it, and then create more and more "dead people".

And in the face of cultural penetration and cultural invasion, these things.

Many of the reactions and comments made by Chinese people are also worth pondering.

This aspect is the most important thing to pay attention to in cultural exchanges.

Maybe it has nothing to do with Li Shaojie in the past.

But when you reach a certain position, you will have to shoulder many social responsibilities.

This is not the so-called moral kidnapping, but the awareness and responsibility necessary to become a better artist.

It is true that Li Shaojie can ignore these things.

No matter what, someone will always stand up.

But why can’t this person be myself?

Li Shaojie felt that he should, was necessary, and was willing to think about and do something.

After all, he has the ability.

At present, there are only a few types of feedback in this regard in China.

For example, the shepherd dog boasts about how good foreign culture is, or the brainless and angry domestic youth say that foreign countries are rubbish, or some so-called right-minded people say that "those who hinder the country are just standing on the moral high ground to accuse others," etc.

Either way, it's all Sabi.

Including those who claim to think calmly and objectively.

Also Sabi.

Because the arrogance of these people determines that they are superstitious about their own "calmness and objectivity".

It is easier to fall into the diode state.

This tends to mislead more people.

If we were to discuss some individual works, or some details of a part of the work, we might be able to say that they were somewhat helpful.

Once this discussion expands to the entire scope, such as.

Japanese comics, lighthouse blockbusters.

Say the words "XX is XXX".

That is definitely Sabi.

I don't know what they are like, but this kind of person is definitely out of his mind.

There are quite a few such people.

For example, ask "Do Japanese comics count as cultural invasion?"

Those who don't like it have the final say, and those who like it don't.

There are a few people who seem to think calmly and think it’s okay, but because they like Japanese comics, they think it’s important to be calm and objective.

However, because such people sometimes do not have a deep enough perspective on problems, it is extremely easy to fall into the trap of those who are interested.

Isn’t this rhythm of dispute actually part of the cultural invasion?

What really needs to be discussed is not whether the so-called "Japanese comics" and "lighthouse blockbusters" are part of cultural invasion.

What needs to be discussed is only a single work, and has nothing to do with such large-scale concepts as so-called "Japanese comics" and "Lighthouse blockbusters".

It has nothing to do with "Japanese comics" and "Lighthouse blockbusters".

Whether it's neon, a lighthouse, or China.

In fact, cultures all lead to the same destination through different paths.

Culture itself is a nation, a country, or even the whole world's reflection and praise of the good and evil of human nature, the dispute over the truth of the universe, and the beauty and ugliness.

Culture itself is good and excellent.

However, culture itself is also used to express the creator’s views on certain things and personal thoughts.

Since it is a personal thought, it is inevitable that it will be biased or contain personal property.

What you need to do to accept the cultures of various countries and delve into the cultural industry is actually very simple.

Stand firm.

You must at least have a clear personal understanding of the thing you are studying.

Finally, Shao Te stood up and set the pace.

At this time, we need to learn more about some issues.

Such as war.

Many famous writers have discussed war.

The most widespread statement is that "war is regarded as an extreme means of diplomacy and ZZ, and it is the highest form of conflict and violent means."

But in fact, this definition is only for this vocabulary.

Most of them are a definitional framework constructed with reference to war theory.

But in fact, in reality, Sun Bin had already said a more ruthless definition of war.

War is a violent means, method, and approach used to achieve the purpose of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages.

Seems to be the same?

This is not the case.

Sun Tzu's The Art of War's concept of war is often more advanced.

[The first is to attack the enemy, the second is to attack the enemy, the second is to attack the enemy, and the third is to attack the city.]

In the eyes of Sun Tzu, the best way to fight is always to "stop fighting" and to "subdue the enemy without fighting" as much as possible.

This can completely sum up a broader definition of war from it.

What is war?

War is to use all the extreme resources that can be mobilized, to use all the extreme means that can defeat the enemy, and to force the other party to accept one's will and thoughts in any extreme way.

This is extreme.

But is there a less extreme way to achieve such a result?

That is, [Forcing the other party to accept one's own will and thoughts, so that one's own country can seek advantages and avoid disadvantages]?

Of course there is.

It means cutting off plans and cutting off friendships.

Strategy does not mean just a strategy for starting a war.

Our ancestors have long told you about the path of culture.

Thought is the greatest power, and our ancestors have demonstrated it to you over thousands of years.

Especially in modern society.

For weak countries, war is still the best way to force the other party to accept its will and ideas.

But what about two or even multiple powerful countries?

War is often a real "destruction for everyone".

The price is too heavy, so try not to fight as much as possible.
To be continued...