If "Huaxia Game Control Practical Technology" gave a full score for the first time, it was exciting that the full scores of the remaining media were like a surging wave that followed, making people breathless.

In these reviews, the media did not introduce too many amazing details about the game due to the principle of confidentiality, but they still did not hesitate to praise the game, as if they wanted to blow the game to heaven.

For example, Lily, the main review editor of Huaxia Game Weekly, commented: "Although Breath of the Wild does not have the usual programs of such games, it may be the essence of open-world games. The game has a stunning and beautiful, interactive world, with dazzling riddles and puzzles, and there is no end to the secrets hidden on the Hailar continent."

For example, the comment from the editor of [Game Frontline] Gudong: "Do you remember when you were young, during the summer vacation, you often pretended to be in your backyard with your friends for a big adventure, imagining the shed as a castle, grass or forest? It seems like you have really embarked on an adventure journey. This is how Breath of the Wild brings me."

For example, Luoyang Shovel, the editor of "Sueren House", said: "Breath of the Wild" is the most ambitious and impressive game in Hatsune's game so far. It redefines the game type that has appeared in the open world for a long time. Many games get 100 points because their quality reaches 100 points, but Breath of the Wild" gets 100 points because the full score is only 100 points!"

Even Suo Ren Interactive Entertainment's mortal enemy, Hardcore Player Magazine, a subsidiary of Hardcore Technology, made an exception to give full marks to its opponent's games: "Breath of the Wild" is a work that is like a milestone and has the hope to become a new starting point for the Chinese gaming industry."

Full marks, full marks, and another full mark. In April bathed in the spring breeze, "Breath of the Wild" is like a bomb, causing a huge explosion in the game circle.

For a loyal fan of Hatsune game like Wang Ze, every perfect score is like a forced injection. He has already pre-ordered a luxury version online in the store, because he is worried about encountering the dilemma of the physical version of "The Last Survivor" that has not arrived for the previous period.

In mid-to-late April, after the game ratings of various media were released one after another, players suddenly realized a problem.

Now sixteen game media have given game reviews for "Breath of the Wild", all of which are full marks, including several game media under Soren Interactive Entertainment's rival Hardcore Technology. If this trend continues, will this game become the first game in history with a full mark score of MC?

Being able to get the first place in the MC score is enough to be recorded in history. If you still get the full score, then you will definitely be unprecedented. "Breath of the Wild" will become one of the most dazzling new stars in the history of the game and illuminate the future of the game industry.

However, just as everyone was discussing it, another game media gave a rating of "Breath of the Wild".

Ask the game, "Breath of the Wild", rating 9.5/10.

Wenhu Games is a game media organization under Wenhu, mainly online business. It has only started to participate in the rating in the past two years, inheriting the argument of Wenhu "elite". It gives most games not high, at least 10 to 20 points lower than the MC score. For example, "The Last Survivor", Wenhu Games gave a rating of 65 points, and the evaluation is "long main line, dull tones, and artificial plot."

In fact, the 9.5 score of "Breath of the Wild" is considered the highest score given by the game, but the rating it gives is a bit shocking.

"Breath of the Wild is undoubtedly an excellent game, with a huge enough world, complex enough puzzles, and free enough gameplay, but the mainstream media in the industry have too much praise. In order to see that the Chinese gaming industry still has hope of future development, I gave it a 9.5 rating."

Under the post reprinting this review to the v9 forum, the reply speed is even faster than refreshing.

[Karoo bath]:???You really have to say that the game quality is not enough, is it okay to get a 9.5? What is the reason? Because other media have given full marks, I insist on getting a 9.5 to show that I am different?

[Man in the Mirror]: This is the funniest joke I have heard in my life. I usually like to be sarcastic, but I didn’t expect that even a game of review is so disgusting.

[Hami Melon Honey Melon]: I think it's okay. You can't follow the trend just because other media have full marks. What if you ask the game really feels that the game is not as full marks? You have to learn to be considerate of others... No, I really can't wash it anymore. Ask the game is purely stupid [Bee--].

[Herbal Tea is not popular]: If he really thinks that the game is not perfect enough and doesn’t get full marks, it would be fine. What’s the reason for this? Is it so embarrassed to say it?

[Light of Stars]: It's good to think about it on the other hand. At that time, "Breath of the Wild" MC score is 99, because the 9.5 game did not get the full score. Then everyone knows how stupid the game is. Its stupidity will be remembered by the history of the game along with the excellence of "Breath of the Wild".

However, the discussion was not over yet, and soon another game media released the rating.

Peanut Network, "Breath of the Wild", 3.5/5.

Peanut.com also has game section ratings, but they are relatively popular and have a very late score. Basically, they wait until the score is stable before following the trend and getting an average score. However, due to the previous incident of "Yanye Courtyard", Peanut.com had many conflicts with Fantasy and Hatsune Video.com, and the score at this time was obviously revenge.

Even the reviews seemed full of gunpowder: "Breath of the Wild" was dull, boring, and the vast world was not at all attractive. It was really hard to hold on for five minutes. This was a transformation failure of Hatsune's game."

This evaluation is in sharp contrast with the previous full-score evaluation, making people wonder if it is the same game.

The masses were filled with righteous indignation because whether it was about the game or Peanut Network, their evaluations violated the most basic principle of objective and fairness, lacked morality and responsibility as a media. What was even more annoying was that these scores would be included in the MC score, lowering the overall evaluation of "Breath of the Wild", but the players had no choice.

However, changes always come faster than plans. Less than ten hours after Peanuts Network released a review of the game for "Breath of the Wild", the person in charge of the mc website issued an announcement on the website, believing that some media lack basic respect for the game, so their scores will be removed from the mc website and will never be included in the future.
Chapter completed!