Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
Prev Index    Favorite Next

Chapter 549 549

Joseph stood in the office, motionless. The sound of the elevator opening was heard from the empty floor, followed by the sound of the door closing. Then, the entire floor was in endless silence, and even as if the sound of the thick night slowly spreading on the ground.

What Alfonso said just now, Hugo did not plan to change his agent, but Lang Meyer said in the company... "Long Meyer said", "Long Meyer said"... In the past month, Hugo had several quarrels with him, but Hugo had never changed his agent. Why? Is Hugo guilty, was Hugo afraid of rumors, or... Joseph fell silent.

"Pulp Novel" is just an unexpected encounter. Is it really like? However, he hopes that Hugo can take on a movie with a pay of over 10 million yuan and stabilize Hugo's first-line actors so that he can win more bargaining chips for the fight with Tracy. He also thinks about Hugo! However, Hugo doesn't appreciate it, and even doesn't want to listen to his advice. But... Tracy, Tracy!

Joseph only felt his head start to suck, and he actually forgot this. Tracy and Long Mayer, whether it was the previous rumors about Hugo changing agents or the beautifying Nazi suspicion caused by the "Schindler's list", they were all conspiracy links. Joseph remembered the recent rumors about Tracy's "Farewell to the Heaven of Love" in the circle... Now everything is stringed up, but it still needs to be verified.

If all this is a conspiracy, then when did it start, and are there any clues to prove it? If not, then how did the misunderstanding between him and Hugo start, and how did things get to where they are today?

Suddenly, Joseph remembered the last words Alfonso said just now. The "National Inquirer" tried to weave lies and pour dirty water on him. Why? If Hugo took the blame for his relationship with him, the bad relationship between them would be known by the media; if Hugo cut off his relationship, then it was revealed that all this was a lie later, then the rumors of Hugo's distrust of himself would become more and more intense... But if Hugo chose to believe in himself, then...

"Oh, God! Oh, God..." Joseph rubbed his cheek hard, but still could not extinguish the anger in his heart. In the end, he could only smash his fist hard towards the wall. The deep pain from the bone made Joseph curl up involuntarily, but it finally made his brain wake up.

Has Hugo changed? Or has he changed himself?

First, I missed the "Shawshank Redemption", and then had a dispute over "Pulp novels"... I missed the last performance of Glory until my death, and missed the premiere of "Schindler's List"... Nicholas Cage, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck's busy work... I'm busy with work, busy with work? I'm busy with work!

Joseph stood there like this, and a torn pain came from the knuckles of his right hand, but he seemed not to feel it. He just stood quietly, feeling the tranquility of blood seeping out of the cracks in the skin. The pain that was as if countless ants were biting slowly spread on the surface of his fist, but he was unwilling to loosen his fist. Instead, he clasped tighter and tighter.

This is a sleepless night, and almost all media are working overtime to catch up with the news. No one is willing to miss this media feast. It is conceivable that when the sun rises the next day, hundreds of media outlets across the United States will launch a fierce news battle. The bloody scene is afraid that even the presidential election will be difficult to match. Perhaps the thunder after the Watergate incident can be compared.

Everything was as expected. When the morning light shone from the east coast to the west coast, the brand new newspapers piled up on tens of thousands of newspapers and magazines across the United States, almost without any suspense, all the front page headlines published Hugo's latest views on the Michael Jackson incident. However, the views of major media vary.

Some of the media obviously believe that Hugo accused the news media of being the dictator who created the witch trial, which will inevitably arouse united resistance from all news media, so it is absolutely correct that they choose to attack Hugo, among which "New.york.post" is undoubtedly one of the banners.

The New York Post was founded in 1801 and is one of the oldest newspapers in the United States. After being acquired by News Corporation in the late 1970s, it was famous for its sensational and gossip. Although its style is similar to supermarket gossip tabloids like the National Inquiry, its influence is not the same level. It is still one of the most important newspapers in New York today.

In the report, the New York Post believed that "Hugo Lancaster pointed at the media, interfered with the media's freedom of speech as an ordinary person, and even questioned the fairness and authenticity of the media. This is undoubtedly an insult to the American media and a huge irony.

As a public figure in the media, Lancaster publicly expressed support to Michael Jackson without any evidence and ignored the victim's testimony, which was undoubtedly a hateful act to help the suspect; what is even more shameful is that Lancaster threw dirty water on the news media without any evidence, and even tried to use such terrible behavior as "witch trial" to accuse the media of pursuing the truth and trying to uphold justice for Jackson, which is definitely an act that needs strong condemnation.

As a public figure, Lancaster must pay more attention to his words and deeds when he is attracted by the attention of young people. He is undoubtedly irresponsible, blindly arrogant, shameless and ridiculous. When Lancaster accused the media of not being judged from the perspective of God, he also tried to judge from the perspective of God.

Media workers who have been on the front line of news all year round regard the pursuit of truth as their noblest pursuit, but this right has been insulted by Lancaster without any evidence to support it. This is undoubtedly a provocation to the entire American law and the provocation to the entire American news. This must be severely condemned and criticized!"

The statement of "New York Post" has been supported by some media, among which the reaction of the "National Inquirer" was the most intense. Anthony's article was almost cursing Hugo directly, and he tried his best to curse Hugo, and spent a lot of time to seek justice, indicating that the information investigated by the newspaper was true and reliable, and all Hugo's accusations were false.

At the end of the article in the "National Inquirer", Anthony even called on all media colleagues to join forces to ban Hugo, starting with boycotting "Schindler's list" and "almost famous".

But unexpectedly, the "New York Post" and the "National Inquiry" seemed to have been in the wrong team this time, because their remarks not only did not receive support from their peers, but instead became the object of condemnation. Unexpectedly, the media's self-reflection and remarks about the "National Inquiry" were almost overwhelming.

The New York Times wrote the title "The Witch Trial arrived in the 1990s, the times regressed, and the tragedy of society."

The front page headline of the Los Angeles Times is, "Who is lying the truth hidden behind the Michael Jackson case."

The news title of the "San Francisco Chronicle" is very concise and eye-catching, "Sobert!" seems to remind all media to wake up from the vortex of pursuit of interests and focus on chasing the truth again.

"USA Today" wrote in black bold at the top of the front page, "The Rodney-Kim incident reappears! The media has become the black hand that fuels the fire!"

The news title of the Wall Street Journal used the "Counterattack of Free Speech" to discuss it. The article believes that Hugo's words play an important role in the wake-up call for the entire media.

The Washington Post is relatively official, "the order of the law, the supervision of the media, and the change in the severity of the role." They try to look at the role of the media's public opinion supervision from a more objective standpoint. After all, the reason why the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech of the media is to allow the media to supervise formally, which is also an important part of the media's pursuit of truth.

The Chicago Tribune (chicago.t Japanese Bune) has a detailed analysis of Hugo's remarks yesterday with the title "Witch Trial, Is it the truth?"

According to statistics, among the ten largest newspapers in the United States that day, eight of them actually chose to analyze Hugo's remarks and even support Hugo's views; only two media chose to crack down on Hugo, believing that Hugo's words were extremely absurd accusations, one was the "New York Post" and the other was the "Honston Chronicle".

On this day alone, the sales of newspapers across the United States reached more than 10 million. This data was placed in the previous three days or even a week of newspaper sales, but this data sprint was completed in one day, which shows the consequences of the collective efforts of all news media today.

In addition to newspapers, radio and TV programs have also attracted the attention. According to incomplete statistics, within two days, the frequency of mentioning the Michael Jackson case and Hugo's accusations against the media "Witch Trial" has reached nearly 50,000 times. In other words, even the beautification of the "Schindler's List" of Nazi suspicion and the impact of "almost famous" on rock can't be compared with this news explosion point.

Under the news media's self-reflection and public opinion disputes, many people began to re-examine the authenticity of other rumors in the Michael Jackson case. After all, there seems to be a lot of evidence at present, but there is almost no evidence and witnesses officially affirmed by the Los Angeles police. So which ones are true and which are false? Did Hugo's "witch trial" really appear?

Thousands of news media held a hot discussion, like a storm, hitting the North American continent in December 1993 and bruised all over the ground. This time the press became the focus of attention. All news professionals, senior practitioners, and university professors joined the discussion:
Chapter completed!
Prev Index    Favorite Next