In the ring structure, the multi-angle setting also has a very special effect. In addition to observing the same event from different angles, it is more about showing that each person's role is changing quietly under different environments and states. At this point, "Pulp novels" have a bit of the style of Western deconstructionist master Jacques.der Rida, and also gives the film more surreal meaning. Although this is not Quentin's original intention, nor is it the film's original intention.

The character Vincent is the core of connecting the whole story. He is the absolute male protagonist in "Vincent and Masha's Wife" and appears as a protector; but in "Gold Watch", Vincent becomes a "some thug" who is shot and killed after appearing, and the owner of the Gold Watch does not even know Vincent's name.

If you look at these two stories in a split way, Vincent's role will undoubtedly be a huge difference.

Maybe the murderer in this story is the savior in another story; maybe the evil villain in this story is the hero who saves the world in another story; maybe the betrayer in this story, but the child who takes risks for his family.

This kind of multi-angle is undoubtedly telling every audience that each participant in the event has his own reasons and state for participating in the event, and the role of the same person at different times and states is also very different.

This philosophical analysis and structure gave the "pulp novel" a deeper meaning, and at the same time, it also infinitely amplifies Quentin's personal stylization, and finally gave birth to a masterpiece that made everyone amazed.

In his debut work, "Dog in the Water", Quentin successfully experimented with the topic of symbiosis between violence and philosophy; "Pu novels" tried complex and orderly structures, thoroughly referenced, generous imitation, the evil and justice of violence, the variation and original ecology of human nature, and the cruelty and hypocrisy of society were presented through the use of long lines, which has become a feature of Quentin.

When it comes to the lines in the movie, they are actually worth pondering. There seems to be a lot of long and boring nonsense, but it seems like there are introductions hidden in the words. There are subtle contradictions or echoes between the way of identity and the way of conversation and the content, and it can always bring unexpected surprises between the next scene and different scenes.

The time limit, spatial dimension, shooting angle, character saturation and theme depth all have a strong Quentin personal style. In the limited two days, several independent but related stories are connected together, and the cruel life that may be real, are clearly displayed. The intertwined characters and events are arranged in an interesting chain of condoms and unique characteristics."

The official magazine of the Cannes Film Festival undoubtedly praises "Pulp Novels". Although this review is not long, it analyzes the film concisely and profoundly. In a few words, you can actually see the pioneering feat of "Pulp Novels".

From the reviews of the official magazine, we can see that most people actually do not fully appreciate the excellence of "pulp novels", because Quentin is undoubtedly cunning. He presents his thoughts on life and his understanding of movies through a pile of nagging and useless nonsense. When viewing the movie, the audience often thinks that those conversations are useless and don't care too much. When they realize that those words have been confirmed at the end of the story, they only have a vague impression in their minds.

This prank-style shooting technique has made many people feel strange after watching "Pulp novels": everyone thinks it is a good movie, just like a cinema audience, and subconsciously stand up and applaud when the movie ends; but if they insist on telling what the advantages of this movie are, everyone hesitates, their heads are muddy, and they can't tell the reason.

Just as the official magazine said, the circular structure is actually just a skill. The real excellence of the movie is that the arrangement of these four stories is also particular. The character in the previous story plays different roles in the story afterwards, including the echo of the lines, which is actually particular. Although everyone says Quentin is a "hodgepodge", how to make the chowder delicious is also a science. Just like the ratatouille Provence, it is not that simple to cook this dish delicious.

Therefore, after the premiere of "Pulp Novel", professional film critics and filmmakers went to the cinema again to watch the movie. They could not blindly praise or criticize like ordinary audiences. They had to say something.

It is precisely for this reason that in the past two days, everyone has been a little secret when talking about "Pulp Novels". Everyone can clearly feel that Quentin gave everyone a huge surprise this time, and "Pulp Novels" have also created a new history; but they have to calm themselves down and not blindly follow them, but wait until they truly understand the movie before making a statement.

So, this strange situation occurred.

On the one hand, there were endless interviews with "Pulp Novels" and audiences also entered the cinema to watch the movie. The "Pulp Novels" arranged by the Cannes Film Festival were full of broadcasts, so they had to reduce the number of works with poor reputations to add "Pulp Novels" to the screenings of "Pulp Novels"; on the other hand, the film reviews were hesitant and hesitant, and they did not see any famous professional film media commenting on the movie for two days, and they looked deserted.

However, this situation was quickly broken. On the afternoon of the 19th, the famous "Chiers.du.cinema" was the first to publish the film review.

France's "Movie Manual", Britain's "Visual and Audio (Private GHTsound), and the United States' "Film.ment", these three magazines can be regarded as the world's most authoritative film magazines. They have different characteristics and different reader groups, but they are undoubtedly receiving great attention.

Cannes is the home of the "Movie Manual", and their reviews have the greatest impact on French audiences, so they were the first to publish film reviews, which also attracted countless attention.

In the rating system with a full four-point score, the "Movie Manual" gave a three-point score of rating, which is even higher than their evaluation of "Mr. Margo". It is also the highest score given by the "Movie Manual" since the opening of the Cannes Film Festival this year.
Chapter completed!