Li Zhongxin sat in the passenger seat of the car, closing his eyes slightly to ponder the education situation in China at this time.

Education is the basis for a century-old plan. Education is an important cornerstone of national rejuvenation and social progress, and it is a moral project that benefits the present and the future.

For a family, cultivating a college student not only provides talents to the country and society, but also drives the entire family to make progress and changes in their ideas, thinking and living conditions.

The more the times move forward, the more prominent the importance of knowledge and talents, and the status and role of education become more prominent. In this matter! Li Zhongxin has always had his ideas.

Li Zhongxin felt that at this time he should find an opportunity to talk to the bigwigs about education, or infiltrate some issues and ideas about education. After all, the advanced education model in later generations is much better than the current education model.

It’s just that Li Zhongxin is difficult to do such a thing at this time because his age is there! A young young man who just graduated from college and talks about the education model opens his mouth and shuts up. No matter who he is, he will not convince anyone.

How to find the right person and how to try to tell the big guys about such things are all difficult problems on Li Zhongxin's head.

Li Zhongxin has always felt that there is a disadvantage in China's heuristic education, which is that it is actually until the answer to a certain question to induce students to find the only answer.

Especially in terms of Chinese reading comprehension, Li Zhongxin still remembers that there was such a thing in later generations, that was, during the college entrance examination, there were several answers in this question, and there were various points to read, and the total reading score was twenty.

This 20-point score is quite difficult to obtain. Most students think this kind of question is too difficult, and their answers are all wrong. So, what should be the correct answer?

A reporter found the original author who wrote this article with such a question. After finding it, he gave the reading question to the original author and asked the original author to answer it. By the way, what was the original author's thought at that time?

What surprised people was that the original author answered such a question according to his thinking when he created this essay. What was the result? As a result, the original author could only score six points according to the answer of the paper-making teacher.

What kind of grades and degree is this? It shows that the author's level is far inferior to those students today.

Is this true in fact? No. Such a thing can be said to be a lack of education. It is that the teachers who gave the test papers made false results and ideas into the correct answers according to their thoughts and wishes.

Li Zhongxin still remembers something. There was an article written by an author. There was a passage that said that when he looked up at the window, it was drizzling outside the window. After a while, when he looked up at the window, it started raining outside the window.

At that time, the article was very controversial. Finally, I found the author and asked the author what kind of mood he felt at that time.

The author said at that time that when I was writing this article, I had no depression or any thoughts. When I was writing this article, it was raining outside the window. After a long time, when he looked up at the window, it was still raining outside.

The author did not have any thoughts because of this, nor did he have any thoughts. However, when he reached the Chinese question, this changed. He said that the author had many different thoughts at this time.

Li Zhongxin was quite confused about such a situation. The author knew the most about what the author wrote about what was like. Why did several teachers get together? What they created according to their ideas were the standard answers, and such answers were all unique.

Under normal circumstances, we all know that all roads lead to Rome, and the thinking of learning is the same. Many students think that their answers should be correct, because they think so when they think about this matter.

It is also a wrong thing to say that their answer is completely wrong. Their way of thinking and ideas are basically close to the answers of several teachers, and the truth is also the one among them. Unfortunately, in this case, when it comes to the standard answer, this is wrong.

According to Li Zhongxin's idea, teaching many other subjects in Chinese teaching should be considered a flexible process. It is open, stretched, and flexible. There should not be too many constraints, too many bonds, too many standards.

Only in this way can students fly easily, absorb happily, and use flexibly in this free world. This kind of Chinese learning is the real Chinese learning. And the requirements for standard answers for many years are castrating students' creativity.

What we really need is not the answer to the question, but the spark, the spirit of not being afraid of breaking the casserole and asking the end, as well as creativity and critical thinking skills.

What is the essence of education and what kind of supreme state to reach, so that students dare to question, challenge authority, and dare to surpass it.

The so-called standard answers attach too much importance to students' memory function and ignore the thinking function of cultivating students. When the teacher tells students directly when giving a lecture, you will remember that when you encounter such questions, you will answer them like this, and if you don't, you will lose points.

As for students, over time, they lose themselves and no longer dare to question them. To some extent, they have become a machine for doing questions.

Under normal circumstances, Chinese language exams and literary appreciation do not conflict, but there are still essential differences between the two.

According to those teachers who set questions in the college entrance examination, Chinese learning in high school mainly focuses on students' thinking training and text interpretation, and the standard answers also need to be discussed and studied in groups. According to such requirements, it is normal that the author of the article himself cannot get a high score.

This statement naturally makes sense, but it is indeed a bit unreasonable if even the original author cannot understand the essence of the article.

This shows the rigidity of Chinese paper marking on one side. The standard answer is the only positive solution. Any excellent, well-founded understanding, even the original author's ideas, cannot score.
Chapter completed!